{"id":277,"date":"2013-06-07T14:14:32","date_gmt":"2013-06-07T05:14:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.hcfm.jp\/journal\/?p=277"},"modified":"2015-08-06T14:14:49","modified_gmt":"2015-08-06T05:14:49","slug":"%e5%8c%bb%e5%b8%ab%e6%82%a3%e8%80%85%e9%96%a2%e4%bf%82%e3%81%ae%e6%b7%b1%e3%81%95%e3%81%ae%e8%a9%95%e4%be%a1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.hcfm.jp\/journal\/?p=277","title":{"rendered":"\u533b\u5e2b\u60a3\u8005\u95a2\u4fc2\u306e\u6df1\u3055\u306e\u8a55\u4fa1"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\uff1c\u6587\u732e\uff1e<br \/>\n\u3000Patient-Doctor Depth-of-Relationship Scale:<br \/>\nDevelopment and Validation<\/p>\n<p>Matthew J. Ridd\u3000Annals\u2028of Family Medicine 2011 November\/December\u20282011\u00a0vol. 9\u00a0no. 6\u00a0538-545<\/p>\n<p>\uff1c\u8981\u7d04\uff1e<\/p>\n<p>\u3010PURPOSE\u3011\u00a0<br \/>\n\u00a0Because patient-doctor continuity has been measured in its longitudinal rather than its personal dimension, evidence to show that seeing the same doctor leads to better patient care is weak. Existing relational measures of patient-doctor continuity are limited, so we developed a new patient self-completion instrument designed to specifically measure patient-doctor depth of relationship.<br \/>\n\u3010METHODS\u3011<br \/>\n\u00a0Draft versions of the questionnaire were tested with patients in face-to-face interviews and 2 rounds of pilot testing. The final instrument was completed by patients attending routine appointments with their general practitioner, and some were sent a follow-up questionnaire. Scale structure, validity, and reliability were assessed.<br \/>\n\u3010RESULTS\u3011<br \/>\n\u00a0Face validity of candidate items was confirmed in interviews with 11 patients. Data from the pilot rounds 1 (n = 375) and 2 (n = 154) were used to refine and shorten the questionnaire. The final instrument comprised a single scale of 8 items and had good internal reliability (Cronbach&#8217;s \u03b1 = .93). In the main study (N = 490), seeing the same doctor was associated with deep patient-doctor relationships, but the relationship appeared to be nonlinear (overall adjusted odds ratio = 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8). Test-retest reliability in a sample of participants (n = 154) was good (intracluster correlation coefficient 0.87; 95% CI, 0.53-0.97).<br \/>\n\u3010CONCLUSIONS\u3011<br \/>\n\u00a0The Patient-Doctor Depth-of-Relationship Scale is a novel, conceptually grounded questionnaire that is easy for patients to complete and is psychometrically robust. Future research will further establish its validity and answer whether patient-doctor depth of relationship is associated with improved patient care.<\/p>\n<p>\u958b\u50ac\u65e5\uff1a\u5e73\u621025\u5e746\u67085\u65e5<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\uff1c\u6587\u732e\uff1e \u3000Patient-Doctor Depth-of-Relationship Scale: Development and Validation Matthew J. Ridd\u3000Annals\u2028of Family  &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hcfm.jp\/journal\/?p=277\" class=\"more-link\">\u7d9a\u304d\u3092\u8aad\u3080 <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">\u533b\u5e2b\u60a3\u8005\u95a2\u4fc2\u306e\u6df1\u3055\u306e\u8a55\u4fa1<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-277","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-7"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hcfm.jp\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/277","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hcfm.jp\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hcfm.jp\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hcfm.jp\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hcfm.jp\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=277"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.hcfm.jp\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/277\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":278,"href":"https:\/\/www.hcfm.jp\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/277\/revisions\/278"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.hcfm.jp\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=277"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hcfm.jp\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=277"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.hcfm.jp\/journal\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=277"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}